Originally Posted by pphillips
We're all biased, so I won't hold it against you. Please try to be accurate though.
Oh, you mean like calling a product that ignores features requested by clients for years
'actively developed' ? nice try there. of course, we're all biased, and it doesn't get any more biased than the owner of a product trying to sweep glaring concerns under the rug.
Blesta is NOT 'actively developed'. A major version every 4 years for something as small as a billing client is not 'actively developed'. that's a hobbyist, nothing more.
As far as WHMCS and Stripe, there are plenty of workarounds , plenty of active modules for it. There's no reason for them to immediately jump on the bandwagon there. The same can not
be said about Blesta.