Hello Markjut, I would like to address your concerns without taking apart your message, as you say. It is also not my first day managing the community, so my points will touch on the general concepts of your post.

As a concerned member of this community, I would like to receive clarifications on something you said. First, you mentioned the job you were hired to do was to "reword some of the tutorials to make them more professional and also to check all of the other major competitors to make sure that the guides were not too similar."

The job description states that you basically have to take someone else's material, reword it and make it look professional... which is paradox by itself. In spite of that, which tutorials would that be based on anyway?

You also first said you were directed to this thread by DemoCentre, and then say no one asked you to post. Why direct someone here if you do not expect them to post? "I have been directed to this thread by DemoCentre to clear a few things up." ... "I hope you read what I say, and I ask you all to be objective and not to try and pick my message apart saying that Nathan told me to write this etc."

Now, as a moderator of this community, I can assure you that the moderation is in line with our policies. Nathan and me had an off-site discussion (if you can name it that - it felt very one-sided). With all the personal threats made to me, HostingDiscussion.com, and other members, I can tell you that DemoCentre is lucky to still have account privileges at HostingDiscussion.com.

Please post all the evidence, and also where the material came from. But what do you expect the moderators to confirm exactly?

Best,