Hi, I've been studding most of the billing systems. Mostly WHMcs and Clientexec and have come to the place where I personally really think that Clientexec is more better than WHMcs, I mean better in the looks and the way the programmers codded it it looks clean and like the way everything is setted up although WHMcs has some nice features and many people like that more.

On your way of seeing it what do you think looks better and is coded nicer? The looks and way its set up.

No doubt in my mind after using both that WHMcs is a better, far better, program.

ModernBill is also advanced software. But If you don't need so many features I hight recommend to write own software which may fit your needs perfectly.

I have been using Whmcs and clientexec..both have different identity and feature..

but i most likely to use Whmcs over clientexec..
even though Whmcs license is more expensive..

i don't know why..

Hands down most hosts do select WHMCS over Modernbill and clientexe, im personally a fan of WHMCs. There are many reasons and both are very similar though i feel WHMCs is simple to use a much more supported and a very popular solution meaning there is a lot of community support out there with addtions, intergration and setup.

It is not that I do not like WHMCS, but right now I do not have a need for it. Some people (like me) use Client Exec for this, and the only issue I have had (besides stupid Paypal with monthly clients) is that last night PSM broke my CE.

Need preference over personal preference, if you need it, use it, its not that its bad, I just don't need it.

whmcs is best and very much worth the money.. clientexec isn't good to be completely honest.