Get Paid to Participate     Twitter     Facebook     Google+
Hosting Discussion
 

Hosting Discussion > Web Hosting Forums > VPS, Dedicated & Colocation Hosting > Datacenter Discussion > Are high availability datacenters going for raised floors ?
forgot password?


Reply


Old
  Post #1 (permalink)   04-02-2005, 03:07 AM
HD Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 7

Status: zhuhair is offline
I read from an article that raised flooring is under scrutiny by high availability datacenters for the below said reasons.

1. Earthquake
2. Cleaning
3. Safety
4. Power distribution
5. Cost
6. Floor loading
7. Access to under-floor cabling and security

Pls share your views on the same..

Best Regards,
Zhuhair.
 
 
 


Old
  Post #2 (permalink)   04-02-2005, 07:28 AM
HD Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 107

Status: TRau is offline
Data Center designs are changing due to the demands (thermal loading) of todays high density designs. The raised floor design with cabling running underneath along with pressurized cooling air is a 30 year old design from days when power densities were far lower. Back in the "old" days when main frames ruled the data center each unit had direct access to the cool air under the floor. In todays vertical rack system, units near the top of a rack often experiance temperatures above 100deg F. The conventional wisdom is that for every 15deg above 70deg long term reliability of electronics decreases 50%. With current rack mount servers a single rack can easily exceed 10KW of thermal load. Next generation systems are expected to exceed 25KW load on a single rack.
Simply put we are reaching a point where air cooling will no longer suffice. HP has already alerted users that future systems will need to return to chilled water for cooling (the older main frames used chilled water, many older data centers still have the chilled water plumbing in place)
 
 
 


Old
  Post #3 (permalink)   04-04-2005, 07:25 AM
HD Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 7

Status: zhuhair is offline
Yes. You are absolutely right. But is it not possible to achieve such cooling (15-25KW) by using a fully ducted return and locally ducted supply in a hard-floor environment. I feel using a chilled water system is more difficult to maintain and we have to be more cautious.

It would be great if I get an expert advice on this..
 
 
 


Old
  Post #4 (permalink)   04-04-2005, 12:44 PM
HD Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 107

Status: TRau is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by zhuhair
I feel using a chilled water system is more difficult to maintain and we have to be more cautious.
Yes, but chilled water is far more efficient than air in its ability to transfer heat. Remember there is decades of experience with chilled water from mainframes. So while it is a little more complicated and one needs to be a little more cautious, it has been used for a long time without major issues. And all indications are that we will all need to become reacquainted with it in the not too distant future.
 
 
 


Old
  Post #5 (permalink)   04-06-2005, 03:21 AM
HD Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 7

Status: zhuhair is offline
Yeah, that's true. Current racks are almost touching 12-15 KW and in the near future we can expect it to reach 25 KW..We should probably go back to chilled water with increased precautions till we get a better option for cooling.

Best Regards,
Zhuhair.
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

New Post New Post   Old Post Old Post
Posting Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Sponsored By: