Make this your Homepage
Hosting Discussion
 

forgot password?


Reply


Old
  Post #1 (permalink)   03-06-2008, 09:01 AM
HD Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 13

Status: NexusWebLinks is offline
Well just to see how you people go for server should you decide to
either get a new one or further expand your hosting business. Intel Xeon or AMD Opteron?

Opteron tends to use less power than Xeon. However, Xeon will have more performance over Opteron.

A 4-socket server will either be a 16-cores Opteron or a 24-cores Xeon.

Xeon Dunnington which will be coming out later half this year will include 6 processing cores per chip.
 
 
 


Old
  Post #2 (permalink)   03-26-2008, 06:03 AM
HD Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14

Status: vpster is offline
This depends on where your data center is located. In some places where electricity is expensive you would want to go with the more economical procesor. In other places you would want to go with the performance processor.
__________________
JustGotVPS.com - Excellent Service Excellent Prices!
 
 
 


Old
  Post #3 (permalink)   03-31-2008, 04:50 AM
HD Amateur
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 60

Status: MisterV is offline
Have a look at 2 these companies
http://serverbeach.com/servers/index.php and http://hqhost.net/en/dedicated.html
In both AMD servers are used to provide premium solutions. I think that this short surway can explain you little bit.
You get what you pay for.
I hope it will help you and you understand my posting.
 
 
 


Old
  Post #4 (permalink)   03-31-2008, 08:30 AM
HD Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 37

Status: vpsville is offline
Power costs are significant, often the most expensive component in hosting (in Canada anyway).

AMD processors, up until recently were the best for low power requirements, but for performance, Intel is king right now.
__________________
VPSVille
Canadian VPS Hosting
www.vpsville.ca
 
 
 


Old
  Post #5 (permalink)   04-01-2008, 08:29 AM
HD Amateur
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 74

Status: G_om is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by vpsville View Post
Power costs are significant, often the most expensive component in hosting (in Canada anyway).

AMD processors, up until recently were the best for low power requirements, but for performance, Intel is king right now.
Intel rules IMO.
 
 
 


Old
  Post #6 (permalink)   04-18-2008, 04:29 PM
HD Amateur
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 55

Status: BobZ is offline
I heard that specialists recommend AMD Opteron more often nowadays
 
 
 


Old
  Post #7 (permalink)   04-18-2008, 04:57 PM
HD Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 34

Status: HL-James is online now
I don't know why people are preferring the Xeon over the Opteron here, the Opteron is easily the better choice.
 
 
 


Old
  Post #8 (permalink)   04-18-2008, 06:27 PM
HD Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5

Status: blueroomhosting is offline
If you want a really energy efficient setup then why not go for a single 65W quad core Phenom rather than two dual core Opterons? The question might be a little hypothetical considering the 9150e hasn't been released yet, but it is only a matter of months now (I hope). Any thoughts on how the two would compare performance wise?

It is amazing that AMD still seem to have the edge in performance per Watt. It is a shame they are still on a .65 process, their current chips on a .45 process would be truly phenomenal.

Jim
__________________
Blue Room Hosting - UK virtual private servers
 
 
 


Old
  Post #9 (permalink)   04-23-2008, 05:56 PM
HD Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SC, USA
Posts: 5

Status: Hostigation is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueroomhosting View Post
If you want a really energy efficient setup then why not go for a single 65W quad core Phenom rather than two dual core Opterons? The question might be a little hypothetical considering the 9150e hasn't been released yet, but it is only a matter of months now (I hope). Any thoughts on how the two would compare performance wise?

It is amazing that AMD still seem to have the edge in performance per Watt. It is a shame they are still on a .65 process, their current chips on a .45 process would be truly phenomenal.

Jim
I'm 100% AMD and have always preferred it that way with the exception of the K5 era. I recently put a couple of dual quad core 2350's online with SAS drives and I simply cannot find their limits yet. I dumped 3 well loaded servers onto one and it is just looking at me asking if that is all I got for it.
__________________
Hostigation.com - High Resource Hosting
WHM/cPanel Servers for Hosting and Dedicated Needs
HyperVM VPS Hosting
Since 7/95 - All Servers owned outright
 
 
 


Old
  Post #10 (permalink)   05-07-2008, 11:29 AM
HD Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 35

Status: JFOC is offline
we use opteron on one of our server and run smoothly also great power too
__________________
50 GB Disk Space, 1000 GB Bandwidth, Master Reseller for Cheap
Web Site : http://www.jfoc.net
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

New Post New Post   Old Post Old Post
Posting Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On