Quote:
Originally Posted by Nile Hadwards
Web sites that are hosted on UNIX and Windows servers can be accessed universally. The difference between the two operating system lies in terms of the software they provide to server data. Windows can always provide better software services for all purposes. In terms of reliability, UNIX is just a few steps ahead since it is known to be extremely stable and does run for years without rebooting. However, Windows can manage to meet the requirements of modern websites far better than UNIX.
Windows is used where Microsoft products are into application like, MS Access databases, ASP for delivering dynamic content, and Vb Script for site enhancements. UNIX is not devised to accommodate the mentioned technologies. Therefore those who are in need of these technologies will ultimately have to depend on Windows. Moreover what UNIX provides, is already there with Windows.
|
They both have their pros and cons.
For example, with *nix you have modrewrite and more advanced directory/file permissions (chmod) which Windows does not by default. Windows does have file and directory permissions but not as easily set as chmod using an FTP client. However, there are IIS add-ons to achieve both modrewrite and chmod functions but they can be costly when added to the cost of the already expensive Windows Server OS.
With Windows you have applications such as Sharepoint and Access databases which *nix does not. Also, the programming languages that are specific to Microsoft are definitely a developer selling point.
Windows servers have come a long way in the past 5 years or so and are quite comparable to *nix servers in matters of reliability, so choosing between the two is really a matter of which programming platforms you prefer and not so much of which is more stable.