Originally Posted by dvduval
If someone's activity is questionable, I'm not sure that logic would say that it okay to publish information about them without their permission. It's your forum and you can certainly do as you wish, but you may just make new members uncomfortable, when their intent was to be helpful, or just ask a question.
There was less logic in a review with not one domain name attached to it for verification purposes.
Your web sites are publicly displayed in your signature. Domain WhoIs is publicly available data. This forum is public. So what permission were you looking for us to get?
By the way, those who are uncomfortable in the face of honesty, I noticed, do not hang around for a long time. That's why our community has grown so much based on values not comprehensible by other communities. We are just doing what a community is supposed to do - consistently improving it.
This, however, I would be more concerned about
Originally Posted by Senad
Could you elaborate which "sensitve" information was distributed? Ours or the ones PolurNet posted?