What are the alternative to HyperVM? - Page 3

siforek · Post #31 (**permalink**) 06-14-2009, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MH-Andy

HyperVM was fine and affordable. Apparently that guy from the WHT topic has phoned his father and is going to talk about the future of the project later.

It's going open-source: http://forum.lxlabs.com/index.php?t=msg&th=12468

Lagniappe · Post #32 (**permalink**) 06-19-2009, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siforek

It's going open-source: http://forum.lxlabs.com/index.php?t=msg&th=12468

It MIGHT go open source... Made me go re-read that whole thread thinking it had been decided. But as of today, no official word from the family has come out on the future of the software.

We're moving on... Have FluidVM installed and running on a couple of servers and are starting to migrate vm's.

jlkhosting · Post #33 (**permalink**) 06-20-2009, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siforek

More and more I'm leaning to Virtuozzo. Yeah, it's expensive compared to others, but you get what you pay for.

Exactly! I used HyperVM for awhile and was never impressed. If you deal with Parallels directly and can offer some volume (ie not a 10 pack of container licenses!) you can get a reasonable price and still make a profit selling small VPS's. Right now may be a selling opportunity for anyone using Virtuozzo as people may (wrongly) assume that they are at risk if you aren't.

Now if only WHMCS had a module...

siforek · Post #34 (**permalink**) 06-20-2009, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlkhosting

Exactly! I used HyperVM for awhile and was never impressed. If you deal with Parallels directly and can offer some volume (ie not a 10 pack of container licenses!) you can get a reasonable price and still make a profit selling small VPS's. Right now may be a selling opportunity for anyone using Virtuozzo as people may (wrongly) assume that they are at risk if you aren't.

Now if only WHMCS had a module...

WHMCS module on the way

Katatonic · Post #35 (**permalink**) 08-04-2009, 10:20 AM

I would highly recommend www.veportal.com

Great software, great support and great price.

OpenVZ only at this stage though.

toxicdav3 · Post #36 (**permalink**) 08-06-2009, 05:40 AM

Proxmox VE looks ok.

Whirly · Post #37 (**permalink**) 08-19-2009, 02:09 AM

My host uses OpenVZ and it's not bad, if not better than HyperVM.

BurstNET · Post #38 (**permalink**) 08-19-2009, 12:20 PM

Our vote goes to vePortal (http://www.veportal.com)...we've been testing it out lately, and as soon as v2 (fixing a few minor bugs) comes out this month we will be offering it to our client base.
.
.

directspace.net · Post #39 (**permalink**) 08-20-2009, 07:16 AM

We use VDSmanager and love it. Its very reliable and very simple.

WhiteOwl · Post #40 (**permalink**) 08-21-2009, 01:16 AM

I've tried OpenVZ and it's very good as well.

BrownEyes · Post #41 (**permalink**) 08-21-2009, 03:58 AM

OpenVZ is good but sometimes it crashes for me :S

hostatree · Post #42 (**permalink**) 10-15-2009, 11:55 PM

We use OpenVS. It seems to work real nice.

veeblox · Post #43 (**permalink**) 10-16-2009, 11:35 AM

I use SolusVM, would highly reccomend. Very reliable.

- Many Thanks,

cyberq · Post #44 (**permalink**) 10-18-2009, 11:36 PM

Virtuozzo is based on OpenVZ, it is not an apart virtualization technology. There are only Xen, OpenVZ and HyperVM. Virtuozzo, VDSmanager use this technologies for Linux and Win. VDSmanager use also own FreeBSD virtualization technology.

tata · Post #45 (**permalink**) 10-20-2009, 01:15 AM

There are many alternatives to HyperVM. The most popular and useful are SolusVM, VDSmanager and Virtuozzo.